Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 20,371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
On September 13, 2018, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
On September 13, 2018, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm
To be precise: (i) TokenLot advertised and sold tokens issued by others; (ii) solicited investors; (iii) processed funds; (iv) enabled secondary trading in those tokens; and (v) advertised and promoted the sale of tokens in exchange for marketing fees paid by token issuers. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm
The Aftermath of South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:20 pm
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Until recently, the law had been settled that any sale (within the United States) of a product that included claimed features of an invention is prior art, even if the sale did not publicly disclose those claimed features. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
Judge Troy Nunley held yesterday, in Tracy Rifle & Pistol, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm
” The SEC found that notwithstanding “[t]he lack of monetary consideration for purportedly ‘free’ shares,” the issuance of the TOM tokens as a “gift” of a security through the Bounty Program constituted a “sale” or “offer to sell” within the meaning of the Securities Act as stated in SEC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 1:46 am
Moreover, FTC rules of practice state that the FTC 'expects all parties to engage in meaningful discussions with staff.' [...] [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 7:57 am
Doctor John’s, Inc v Village of Cahokia, 2018 WL 4283038 (SD IL 9/7/2018) [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:11 am
The amici argued that the lower court’s failure to consider relevant precedents would subvert the North Carolina legislature’s intent to safeguard the integrity of North Carolina’s securities markets for out-of-state and North Carolina investors (NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 8:32 am
Oscar’s article reads: The ruling by the Third District Court of Appeal in Diaz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:10 am
In the case styled as the Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
” Levine v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
Simply stated, if plaintiff had not pursued the fatally flawed claitns in the Underlying Holdover Proceeding, plaintiff would not have faced any liability whatsoever. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Grand jury subpoenas, unlike trial subpoenas, may be served nationwide: there are geographical limitations within the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:04 am
In the second case, JSL Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
