Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 19,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
In fact, the court repeatedly notes that it wasn’t trying to prejudice the lower court’s further proceedings on the prima facie case, but this sends a pretty strong hint to the district court judge that the Ninth Circuit thinks this case should fail. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Still, it's a concession that a patent was weak in the first place.Originally, it looked like the period between December 2019 and May 2020 was going to be an extremely busy one for the Nokia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm
Apple v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Gall v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
” That four justices saw Padilla as not mandated by precedent provided strong evidence that it announced a new rule. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:02 am
Facts Hurbain v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
But this begs the question: if the departure point is strong IPRs, what is it left to balance, then? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
v=1 Li, T., Yang, T., Zhu, J. 2022. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 12:06 pm
Relying on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
Ohio) in Pillar Title Agency v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:12 pm
Camacho v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:46 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am
A strong protector of speech Kennedy’s most important free speech opinion was Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:45 am
Well, buck up, Sparky, because after 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:26 pm
I think she will see the stare decisis value of Humphrey's Executor as too strong. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The Fourth Circuit's recent decision in Washington Post v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
