Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 11,371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:39 am
TorrentFreak says that Boente told the court "The United States continues to request that the court deny any effort to impose unprecedented financial or supervisory obligations on the United States related to the Carpathia Servers".The online system used to register initial copyright claims at the U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
“, Griffin Law “High Court provides guidance on “serious harm” requirement under Defamation Act 2013 and on procedural management of defamation claims“, Neil Blake and Thomas Turner, Herbert Smith Freehills – Litigation Notes “Bar Raised for Libel Claimants“, Jo Vale, Hold the Front Page. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Gordon Hylton, University of Virginia School of Law, “The Fuller Court and the State Police Power: A Quantitation Study in the History of Federalism”Bernie D. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:08 am
Further, businesses need uniformity and legal certainty to function, but uniformity can also be negotiated around a high data privacy bar. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
The lower courts must now examine the case in light of the state supreme court’s interpretation of the law. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:01 am
For example, the district attorneys state some 30,000 registered sex offenders in California are not red-flagged on the system Uber uses. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
Beyond Supreme Court review, which is never guaranteed (consider the havoc wreaked by the Court’s passing on State Street Bank), or corrective legislation (which is even more speculative), en banc review by the Federal Circuit presents the last clear chance to avert potentially dire consequences. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 3:26 pm
Stevens and Nelson Gary writing out of Columbus, Ohio on the firm’s Vorys on Labor blog Tyson, McDonald’s Cut Ties With TN Chicken Farm After Video Showing Abuse – From the news desk at Food Safety News Tips for Lawyers Who Want Good Results – Professor Emeritus at University of Missouri School of Law John Lande writes on the State Bar of Texas’ Texas Bar Blog California Legislature Advances UAS Legislation – San… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
California Teachers Association. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
From the States and Municipalities: California – L.A. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm
The court also barred Unum from raising new reasons in court that were not listed earlier, citing Harlick v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:45 am
The court reporter swore him in. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:56 am
Employment lawyers won't take the case because there usually isn't any civil cause of action in the at will employment environment of California law.Consequently, "injuries" occur in cases that would not be filed by disgruntled employees in civil courts because of cost or procedural barriers.Labor Code section 3600(a)(10) was added a few reforms ago to arrest the filing of post-termination cases, as they are called, where there is no objectively verifiable… [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 1:32 pm
And it’s no wonder with California being the home of 32 military bases. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
A federal district court in California has denied the studios’ motion to dismiss, finding that the federal and California antitrust claims were sufficiently pleaded and not time-barred (In re Animation Workers Antitrust Litigation, August 20, 2015, Koh, L.). [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:21 am
” (A bar on direct communication was reversed by the court of appeals; the threat/harassment prohibitions were upheld.) [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:15 am
California Teachers Association involves a First Amendment challenge to laws affecting employee speech. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am
California’s “primary assumption of the risk” doctrine was first set forth in Knight v. [read post]
