Search for: "United Security Bank" Results 5261 - 5280 of 10,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The validity and interpretation of any rule of the State Board of Social Welfare, regulation of the Department of Social Services or policy of the County Commissioner of Social Services is, therefore, governed by the Constitution of the United States, the Social Security Act and regulations of the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare adopted under that Act, the New York State Constitution and the Social Services Law. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:53 pm by Cody M. Poplin
The United States’ ineffective attempt to prevent key allies from joining the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank made that abundantly clear. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:08 pm by Cody M. Poplin, Elina Saxena
Indeed, the United States conducted its own airstrikes in Syria yesterday near Aleppo, without warning the Russians. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Alex Loomis
”  Granted, not all data is covered by the European Directive (bank transfers and hotel bookings, for example, are excluded), but about 4500 companies nevertheless rely on the safe harbor framework to transfer commercial data from Europe to the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:21 pm by Cody M. Poplin
  Obstructing implementation of the JCPOA would greatly undermine our national security interests. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 3:17 pm by Katie Lieberg Stowe
Cote of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York endorsed Bank of New York Mellon’s (“BNYM”) September 18, 2015 letter reporting that the parties had settled a case in which BNYM sought repurchase of a number of allegedly defective loans as trustee for the GE-WMC Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-1. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On February 10, 2015, United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 2199 that requires all Member States to take efforts to prevent the trade of artifacts illegally removed from Syria after 2011 and from Iraq after 1990. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm by Justin Xu* and Robert Darwell
On February 10, 2015, United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 2199 that requires all Member States to take efforts to prevent the trade of artifacts illegally removed from Syria after 2011 and from Iraq after 1990. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On February 10, 2015, United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 2199 that requires all Member States to take efforts to prevent the trade of artifacts illegally removed from Syria after 2011 and from Iraq after 1990. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On February 10, 2015, United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 2199 that requires all Member States to take efforts to prevent the trade of artifacts illegally removed from Syria after 2011 and from Iraq after 1990. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On February 10, 2015, United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 2199 that requires all Member States to take efforts to prevent the trade of artifacts illegally removed from Syria after 2011 and from Iraq after 1990. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
Consequently, Bank also requested its employees to not keep records of their personal passcodes for security reasons. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
National Australia Bank, the U.S. securities laws apply only to investors who purchased their shares on U.S. exchanges and to domestic transactions in other securities – which explains why the plaintiff’s lawyers here filed the lawsuit only on behalf of U.S. [read post]