Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 14,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am
” In that case, the court discerned a grant of jurisdiction in a charter that authorized the Red Cross to “sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
From Japan to the United States and beyond, karaoke is wildly popular. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:38 am
" * * * Cavel International, the plaintiff in this case, owns and operates the only facility in the United States for slaughtering horses. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
United States sharply distinguished automatics from semiautomatics. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm
The court noted that ‘the near-universal and firmly established common-law rule in the United States flatly prohibited the admission of juror testimony to impeach a jury verdict. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 8:44 am
Mayer, which held that private acts of race discrimination in housing were prohibited by the Civil Rights Act; and United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
In the first case, Frank v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
United States in 1992, and Printz v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:07 am
A federal jury found that the mistakes of James Moser in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 7:51 pm
[9] See generally Walt Disney Prods. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:35 am
In the 2009 case of Ginsberg v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
Visitors to the closed websites are now greeted with the following message from ICE: “This domain name has been seized by ICE — Homeland Security investigations, pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States District Court under the authority of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:16 am
Of the two, one would prefer to cover United States v. [read post]
