Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 4:17 pm
That question is the crux of the Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
If the examination standards in the United States were not changing, we might expect successful applications in the United States by US inventors to grow at about the same rate as our measure of internationally important inventions originating in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:31 am
Id. at 138-39 (quotation marks, citations, footnotes, and edits omitted; emphasis added); see also Ellsberg v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
United States and two related cert petitions the justices will consider at Monday’s “long conference,” the first after their summer recess, that “present what is unquestionably the most important civil-military relations question that [the court has] confronted in decades. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
(citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
United States, 585 U. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v J & S United Amusement Corp., 67 NY2d 1044, 1046 [1986]; accord Allstate Ins. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm
Since the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
The Supreme Court made a noteworthy contribution to the crescendo in our national conversation about race in its recent Texas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:58 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
Such forum selection provisions—known as federal forum provisions or FFPs—were broadly implemented in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
Such forum selection provisions—known as federal forum provisions or FFPs—were broadly implemented in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolfe reports that the court “appeared likely to side with the Trump administration in its effort to end a program that lets nearly 700,000 young, undocumented immigrants live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
KG (IPKat) (Class 46) CFI: Frag Comercio Internacional, SL v OHIM, Tinkerbell Modas LTDA – Have you ever seen two less likely allegedly similar marks? [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am
Menzel v. [read post]
