Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 5261 - 5280 of 10,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
This event will focus on the OHIM Community trade mark opposition decision in CANAL + v KABLEPLUS of 13 February 2014, where an opponent was put to proof of use of a mark which was not the basis of his opposition. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Matt Danzer
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm by Andrew Frisch
Nevertheless, both the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concluded that the expert testimony was sufficient to establish that damages resulting from the “overbuilder” theory of injury were measurable on a classwide basis. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
“However, since Abood, the Supreme Court has repeatedly acknowledged that compelling a state employee to financially support a public sector union seriously impinges upon free speech and association interests protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution,” he argued, among other contentions. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The same Ms Swift has been working hard to secure trade mark protection in the United States for elements of her song lyrics, such as the vivid imagery of "this sick beat" and the rather more prosaic "we never go out of style". [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Given the high percentage of the market open to Doncaster Pharmaceuticals even where it could not use the REGURIN trade mark, SEP's exclusive use of the REGURIN mark in the UK did not contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States for trospium chloride. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the TTAB's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:00 pm by Wells Bennett
On the eve of another series of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am by James Kachmar
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]