Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 9,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2021, 12:39 pm
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Beckley Oncology Assocs. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
The case decided this week is Moore v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
A group of 50 organisations and nearly 90 individual experts have signed a statement against the US Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) proposal to ask non-citizens to provide the passwords to their social media accounts in order to enter the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am
United States, 16-9649, Richter v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:33 pm
” If the answer is affirmative, the DNI must report how many such searches were conducted; When the United States first began relying upon FISA to support collection of information of “large numbers of United States persons with no known connection to suspicious activity[;]“ Whether the government’s statements to the Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
Henley’s name in a transformative nature invoking the protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution” and that “the advertisement is obviously a joke. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
The TDRA establishes that “[a] famous mark is one that ‘is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The rule was entitled “Independent Contractor Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act” (commonly designated as 2021 IC Rule). 12 It marked a significant departure in emphasis from the economic reality test which the courts and the DOL previously adopted. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
TERRY, Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm
United States 22-118Issues: (1) Whether the jury clauses of Article III and the Sixth Amendment or the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment bar a court from imposing a more severe criminal sentence on the basis of conduct that a jury necessarily rejected, given its verdicts of acquittal on other counts at the same trial; (2) whether the Supreme Court‘s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:12 am
“[I]t does not appear that [Complainant’s] mark is used outside the United States (aside from the fact that Internet users worldwide presumably can view Complainant’s website). [read post]
