Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 5281 - 5300 of 10,977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 6:37 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities: Arkansas – Ethics Panel Issues Opinion on Lobbyist GiftsArkansas News – John Lyon | Published: 6/19/2015 The Arkansas Ethics Commission issued an advisory opinion stating that state agency directors, agency deputy directors, agency employees, and most local elected officials and their staffs and the staff members of constitutional officers are not barred from accepting gifts from lobbyists under Amendment 94. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:21 am by Thomas D. Nevins
Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773, 791 (1975)(“the fact that the State Bar is a state agency . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Supp.2d 364, 374 (D.N.J. 2004) (UTPCPL claims barred under Pennsylvania law because there is “no duty to disclose any information directly to Plaintiff”).California courts did pretty much the same thing in Kanter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Sokau's court-appointed attorney was as terrible as his court-appointed interpreter, the trial court and Court of Appeal would grant him a new trial. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Attorney, Past Education Chair for the California State Bar Law Practice Management and Technology Section, Founder of JurisPro Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The ABA has been very successful in persuading the state courts; the only significant holdout is California. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am by Steve Vladeck
In the process, the Justices reiterated not only that, in federal habeas cases, petitioners have a high bar to overcome in showing that a state court’s harmless error determination was incorrect, but also that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) mandates deference to that determination. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 5:56 am by Legal Profession Prof
An attorney who had failed to comply with the terms of probation in a prior disciplinary matter should be disbarred as a result, according to a recommendation of the California State Bar Court Review Department. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:16 am by Legal Profession Prof
The California State Bar Court Review Department proposes a 30-day actual suspension as reciprocal discipline for sanctions imposed in Nevada. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
California Teachers Association 14-915Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
Before a prisoner can file a habeas corpus petition in federal court collaterally attacking his state conviction, he must first exhaust all his remedies in state court. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am by Jon Sands
The court pointed out that the Dixon bar was inconsistently applied until September 30, 1993, when the California Supreme Court decided Harris. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:34 pm
Some states automatically impose a survivorship period (usually 120 hours or five days). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
For the first time since this crusty old man was on the bar mitzvah circuit, the United States has a Triple Crown winner. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:57 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:32 am by Jeff Welty
My colleague Michael Crowell wrote a fascinating blog post here on whether retention elections are consistent with the state constitution, including an intriguing discussion of a similar issue arising in Tennessee, where the entire state supreme court recused itself from hearing the matter and a “special supreme court” was convened. [read post]