Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 48,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2022, 12:21 pm
In a way, the decision, Berkley National Insurance v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:49 am
While fee-shifting by-laws were initially upheld by the Delaware courts in ATP Tour Inc v Deutchser Tennis Bund in 2014, it did not take long for the legislature to respond. [read post]
24 May 2017, 9:17 am
In other words, student loans were only supposed to supplement education costs. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:40 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:32 am
The case, Guam v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:40 am
Which leaves us wondering why ObamaCare© v?. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:17 pm
Tweet Tags: failure to warn, pharmaceuticals, preemption, Wyeth What Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:25 am
PartsRiver, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:14 pm
The Appeals Court concluded, "The district court's denial of an award of attorney fees and litigation costs is vacated, and this matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to award RBCA's fees and costs that were reasonably incurred in furtherance of the Clean Water Act's purpose. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Back to Jones v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Thorogood v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:49 pm
Metavante Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in PhRMA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Army Corps v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:18 am
A 2005 lawsuit, Martinez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 11:25 pm
The case is CP Food & Beverages v US Fire Insurance Co. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:39 am
Listen for them, May 30, 2017, By Lawrence K Altman, M.D., The News and Observer More Blog Entries: Baugh v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
The appellants are entitled seek the costs of the appeal to the Supreme Court and must provide security for costs of the appeal in the sum of £85,000. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:34 am
Both the husband and the aunt agreed to the adjournment, provided the wife paid the costs thrown away, and that a wasted costs order was made against the wife's solicitors, on the basis that they had failed to join the beneficiaries.A wasted costs order was duly made by District Judge Bassett-Cross, with the costs estimated at over £100,000. [read post]
