Search for: "DOES, 1-20" Results 5281 - 5300 of 27,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2013, 2:28 pm by David M. Goldman
This special anywhere from 1/2 to 1/3 off of the normal price of the Gun Trust with legal support. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:31 am by Andrew Frisch
(Id. at ¶¶ 19-20) Plaintiff did not have responsibility for exercising his own discretion or judgment when loading. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 12:58 pm by Amy Howe
Guido (to be argued Oct. 1, 2018): Whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, which bars employers from discriminating against employees because of their age, applies to local governments with fewer than 20 employees. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Stephen Fairley
Cost is $20 if you register by Oct. 31, $30 if you register by Nov. 1 and $35 on the day of the event. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Robert Elliott, J.D.
If management does not "get it" and does not pay attention to it, it will not get done. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm by Armand Grinstajn
Since the Parent Application as originally filed does not refer to CDRs according to Chotia, the divisional application contains subject-matter going beyond the content of the earlier application as filed and does not meet the requirements of A 76(1). [25] The [patentee] has argued that this decision would contradict decision T 500/01, taken by this Board in a different composition and referring to the patent granted on the basis of the parent application. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:47 am
§ 15-73-20 sets forth that "If the user or consumer discovers the defect and is aware of the danger, and nevertheless proceeds unreasonably to make use of the product and is injured by it, he is barred from recovery. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
 For example, the company said that “Rudy outsold Gatorade 2 to 1! [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
A de minimis rule exempts covered corporations that repurchase less than $1 million of their stock during a given taxable year, and the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In fact A 113(1) does no such thing. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 12:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The appellant was summoned to attend oral proceedings scheduled for 6 March 2020.In a communication dated 20 February 2020, the Appeal Board informed the appellant of its preliminary opinion and gave reasons why it considered that the appellant's main request would have to be refused while her auxiliary request was allowable (requests as set out in point II above). [read post]