Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 5281 - 5300 of 7,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm by Kevin
I haven't always been that kind to Justice Scalia (or to Justice Scalia's hats), but I do think he's a very good writer, and so I'm glad to be able to quote him saying something I agree with. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:14 am by Dan Harris
This company should have specified in its contract that it wanted a bag that could hold x number of kilograms. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:05 am by Ira Meislik
But, where does that leave a deserving tenant with a valid monetary claim? [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:10 am by SHG
Does fortune favor the bold? [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:00 am by Daithí
Within the EU: 12 include, 4 express exclude, 10 say natural persons (presumed exclusion), 1 x 30-year limit. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:44 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
 I agree that the evidence, as presented, did not establish proof by clear and convincing evidence and the charge should be dismissed.Edward X. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:29 am by Andrew Moshirnia
I shudder to think that any information I store in the cloud (often with many stated guarantees of privacy) is suddenly fair game for government seizure. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Jonathan Baron
(In a separate essay, I assess the effect of the discount rate.) [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
In Worsham, the absence of a prohibition on sexual intercourse set up a constitutional right, not a statutory right: If doing X with a person is lawful, a restriction on speech soliciting the person to do X has to pass strict scrutiny. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am by Peter Mahler
Thus, if the shareholder-petitioner seeking judicial dissolution of a corporation is a citizen of State X, the corporation is a citizen of State Y, and a named respondent shareholder is a citizen of State Z (or any state other than X), there is complete diversity of citizenship and the federal court has subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:11 am by tekEditor
We would like to see the inclusion in HTTP/2.0 of a "no buffering" flag at either the message or the chunk level, to indicate to the recipient and any intermediaries that the flagged content should not be delayed for buffering or I/O-coalescing purposes. 3. [read post]