Search for: "Davis v. State"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 6,177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:54 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
" to which plaintiffs replied "Yes".Judge Davis then stated he was considering striking all of Dr. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
By Meaghan KlemAddressing an issue of first impression in Indiana law, the Indiana Court of Appeals held Thursday that “circumstances of animal cruelty may create exigent circumstances to permit a warrantless search of the curtilage,” and that the results of the curtilage search may provide probable cause for a further search of the property.In Davis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
Davis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
Supreme Court's decision relating to the Confrontation Clause in Davis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Carlton Davis, Jr. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:32 pm
In Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
The report rightfully notes that the current judicial system in those two states is significantly flawed as it leaves room for the wrongful conviction and execution of innocent people, something that was confirmed even by interviews with public officials. [read post]
CA7 affirms conviction for civil rights violation for racially motived searches by off-duty officers
10 Jun 2009, 4:58 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
Davis. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:34 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:45 am
Accolade Systems LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
The case, Bilski v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 2:29 am
Daniel Sokol Helen Davies (Brick Court Chambers) & Richard Blakeley (Brick Court Chambers) describe Merger Action Group v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
Davis, in which he argued that the Social Security Act's provision for unemployment insurance was a device to overcome states' fear of being generous with UI benefits and thereby becoming welfare magnets. [read post]
28 May 2009, 10:14 pm
Davis, 679 F.2d 845, (11th Cir. 1982). [read post]
