Search for: "Doe v. Smith"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 7,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
However, it does form the background for the decision in Convatec v Smith & Nephew [2011] EWHC 2039 (Pat), handed down this morning by HHJ Birss – the Judge having discarded his usual Patents County Court hat for the matter and donned that of a Judge of the High Court.When but a kitten, one of the first things that one learns about tearing around the place with reckless abandon is the fact that most inanimate objects simply cannot be trusted. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:37 am
Indeed, Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:56 am
Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
” Rubenstein also pointed out that in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals ruled that including charges concerning an employee's performance that were previously addressed in a counseling memorandum does not constitute double jeopardy. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:51 pm
The NCAA 2010-2011 Division I Manual does not appear to discuss Social Media/Social Networking Monitoring and/or censorship so I am not sure how any NCAA institution thinks that it is acceptable to monitor and then censor its student-athletes.In Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
GA, Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:30 am
Clive Stafford-Smith, Director of Reprieve, said it would be a “white-wash” and complained that “national security continues to be conflated with political embarrassment in this process”. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court cited them with approval in Wal-Mart and Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
Tooke v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:39 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:10 am
Is this test appropriate as currently presented, or does it require a bit more seasoning? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
" Virginia's constitution sets up a General Assembly (Article IV), Governor (Article V), Judiciary (Article VI), and Constitutional Officers (Article VII Section 4). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:42 pm
Indeed, Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
(Zelig v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:45 pm
What degree of flexibility does ‘under mutually acceptable terms and conditions’ allow Astrazeneca? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
[This post was written by Drew Boortz and Julya Vekstein, a summer associate in Reed Smith's Washington, DC office] When does a work made abroad and published on the Internet qualify for protection under US copyright law? [read post]
