Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 7,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm
Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
AJ (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1191 (27 July 2011… Court of Appeal dismisses 3 joined asylum appeals: welfare of children was sufficiently taken into account. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
In the case of Perry v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
– practical ramifications of ECJ’s decision in MPS v Murphy and FAPL v QC Leisure (1709 Copyright Blog) Levies for private copying when blank media are imported: who pays? [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm
Professor Friedman has posted several amicus filings for Williams v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:42 pm
Professor Friedman has posted several amicus filings for Williams v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
Language Line Services, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
As it happens, a week before the Florida court decision, an Illinois appellate court handed down a decision in Schneider v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, stating that the criminal standard of proof was not required for confiscation, and that the English court was entitled to consider evidence which formed the basis of a previous charge against the appellants in Portugal as there was no link between the proceedings. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, stating that the criminal standard of proof was not required for confiscation, and that the English court was entitled to consider evidence which formed the basis of a previous charge against the appellants in Portugal as there was no link between the proceedings. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm
This distinction established, she stated that links are themselves references, which give the person making them no control over the material linked to, and do not in themselves communicate its content. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
Yorkshire-based Samuel Smith, one of the oldest English breweries still in existence, registered as a trade mark a stylised white rose device (above, right), this being both distinctive of the brewery and an allusion to its strong connection with Yorkshire, the white rose being that county's ancient emblem. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:15 pm
Read the judgment (in English) here. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Simpson, 2008 SCC 40, and Grant v. [read post]
