Search for: "High v State" Results 5281 - 5300 of 35,514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:52 am by Howard Bashman
Wade Abortion Rights; State’s brief for coming high court case says landmark abortion decision violates Constitution’s provisions on states’ rights. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It leaves the application of that test to the facts of this case for the High Court, after the parties have had an opportunity to amend their pleadings. [read post]
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:55 am by Stewart Baker, Bryce Klehm
And TOLA represents a high-water mark for those efforts. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:41 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am by Joseph D. Kearney
At least on the Chicago lakefront, the unique standing rule of the public dedication doctrine elicited a high level of enforcement activity. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:34 am by Austin M. Scherer
The Scheme Michael Ben-Jacob’s clients are mainly high net-worth individuals, family offices, and “closely held” businesses.[3]  The activity allegedly started around 2011 and ended in August 2015 after Denmark received a tip from a whistleblower and a foreign government. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:34 am by Austin M. Scherer
The Scheme Michael Ben-Jacob’s clients are mainly high net-worth individuals, family offices, and “closely held” businesses.[3]  The activity allegedly started around 2011 and ended in August 2015 after Denmark received a tip from a whistleblower and a foreign government. [read post]