Search for: "House v. State" Results 5281 - 5300 of 25,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2010, 2:36 pm by NL
Ms Makisi’s solicitors wrote stating that Ms Makisi wished to make oral representations in addition to those in writing, ‘in line with the Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999? [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
Because while everything else in the Constitution can be amended by a 2/3 vote in each house of Congress followed by ratification by 3/4 of the States, the Constitution provides a special rule for equal representation in the Senate: "no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:10 pm by Liza Weiman Hanks
  If they have a Will, that document states who inherits the estate. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:59 pm
  The United States Supreme Court seems to otherwise have tried to put the calamity of Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Matthew Billy – Senior Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Matthew Billy – Senior Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:02 pm by Unknown
Hoopa Valley Tribe (Clean Water Act; Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlUnited States of America v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Matthew Billy – Senior Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Matthew Billy – Senior Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
Frankfurter decided that it was a political question only to be resolved by the legislative branches of government because Article I, Section IV gave Congress exclusive power to secure fair representation of the states in the House. [read post]