Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 5281 - 5300 of 8,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am by Susan Brenner
  The judge began his opinion by noting that “[i]t is It is axiomatic that whether. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am by Arthur F. Coon
” The Court endorsed the principle that “[w]here an EIR contains factual evidence supporting the conclusion that aesthetic impacts will be insignificant, that conclusion must be upheld. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Otherwise, the appeal must be rejected as inadmissible under R 101(1).According to A 108, third sentence, “[w]ithin four months of notification of the decision, a statement setting out the grounds of appeal shall be filed in accordance with the Implementing Regulations. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 4:19 pm by pscamp01
” “Nevertheless, I wouldn’t like it–I can’t see the players nor the ball,” admitted Mr. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:43 am by Kate Fort
The parties have briefed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the matter is ripe for decision. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
To put the matter simply, I can’t tell at this stage whether there’s really been a substantial narrowing—that is, whether there are people whom the US used to target whom it is, as a matter of new policy, no longer targeting because the President regards the AUMF conflict as winding down and in its end phase. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Motion in limine decisions are usually a matter of checking off this or that from a long list. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:29 am by LindaMBeale
Related articles Useful information on 501(c)(4)s and 527s and the IRS's scrutiny dilemma Leo W. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:19 am by Robert Ambrogi
In an article in the Illinois Bar Journal, lawyer Adam W. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
As I wrote in my 2004 book, Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
Gore, the December 2000 decision that halted the Florida recount and gave the presidential election to George W. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:43 am by Eric Penzer
 But that is precisely what happened in Matter of Young decided earlier this year by Nassau County Surrogate Edward W. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Because Bowman thus reproduced Monsanto’s patented invention, the exhaustion doctrine does not protect him.[3] Were the matter otherwise, Monsanto’s patent would provide scant benefit. [read post]