Search for: "J. C." Results 5281 - 5300 of 19,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 10:24 am by FDABlog HPM
Patent No. 6,677,358 (“the ’358 patent”)) on its drug product, PRANDIN (repaglinide) Tablets, as a result of Caraco’s FDC Act §505(j)(5)(C)(ii)(I) counterclaim. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm
Todos os dispositivos questionados na ADI 2220 já estavam suspensos desde agosto de 2008 por liminar concedida pelo próprio STF. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:34 pm by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
A expectativa é de que com o Processo Digital a prestação jurisdicional se torne mais célere. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It was found that the disclosure of the invention was of such a general nature that it deprived the skilled person of the information he/she needed to understand how to proceed from the first reaction value collected in step A through steps B, C and D to the determination on a probabilistic basis of the genotype of step E. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
In this sense, there is probably no need to recall the (endless) series of references for a preliminary ruling on national private copying exceptions and, a few months ago, the decision in Soulier, C-301/15 [here and - particularly - here], just to mention a couple of examples.Now comes a further CJEU ruling in which this trend is once again visible.Earlier this week, the Court issued its judgment in ITV Broadcasting v TVCatchup, C-275/15 (TV Catchup… [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
The Federal Court of Canada [2019 C 29] recently saw a battle between two wax seal jewellery manufacturers: Pyrrha Design, and Plum & Posey. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
 Anyway this, Alberto's 56th weekly summary, reads as follows:* Green J quashes UK private copying regulationsA few weeks ago Green J issued a judgment concerning the recently-introduced UK exception for personal copies for private use, concluding that it does not currently envisage a fair compensation requirement [here]. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
When commenting on the decision of Asplin J, this Kat said:This Kat thinks this decision is quite an important one, but not so much in legal terms. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm
With so much else going on today, it seems almost a pity to let everyone know that the tangled world of plant variety protection was stirred to its roots by the publication of the Opinion of Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) Advocate General Jääskinen in Case C‑242/14 Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH v Gerhard und Jürgen Vogel GbR, Jürgen Vogel and Gerhard Vogel, this being a request for a preliminary ruling from the… [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
Another 59,178 board at two stations in Queens that serve the J, Z and E, and the Broadway Junction station in Brooklyn, which serves the J, Z, A, C and L. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:48 am by Wendy
The following 28 titles have been added to the Oxford Scholarship Online Law module.Birkbeck staff and students can access them either via the library catalogue or by going to: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/lib/elib/databases/arts/oso Abass, A. (2010) Protecting Human Security in AfricaAbel, R. (2010) Lawyers on TrialArmstrong, K. (2010) Governing Social InclusionBarber, N. (2010) The Constitutional StateBarden, G & Murphy, T (2010) Law and Justice in CommunityBloch, F. (2010) The Global Clinical… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 11:07 pm by Will Baude
On the other hand, none of the Justices seemed ready to adopt J-Crew’s position either. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:14 am by Giles Peaker
This was not avoided by the provisions of Section 215B, which states: 215B Shorthold tenancies: deposit received on or after 6 April 2007(1) This section applies where—(a) on or after 6 April 2007, a tenancy deposit has been received by a landlord in connection with a shorthold tenancy (“the original tenancy”),(b) the initial requirements of an authorised scheme have been complied with by the landlord in relation to the deposit (ignoring any requirement to take particular steps… [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:48 am by Patricia Hughes
(Chhina, SCC, para.71) In dissent, Abella J. begins with the same sta [read post]