Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
The judges added that Rule 37 of Regulation 2868/95, which establishes that 'the applicant must provide particulars showing that he is allowed under the applicable national law to lay claim to that right', comprising details on the content of that law (Case C-263/09 P, Edwin v OHIM), is applicable to Article 53(1)(c) CTMR [Do: tell the OHIM which national law your right is based upon, what its content and interpretation is, how your sign qualifies for the protection offered by it;… [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Article V of the Constitution lays out two mechanisms for amendment. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
And in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Ohio or Roe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
Maryland v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm
In that context, I remember how Judge Robart in Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
And in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:00 am
While not the barometer of negligence, running any of these potential lawsuit defendant scenarios across a lay person, i.e. the reasonable person, would likely elicit the response, "that's just ridiculous. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
To take a leading case, in Whren v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Notably, the key decisions pre-date Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 7:18 am
” Boyd v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
In Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:07 pm
To speak that way is to lay out an ambivalence in language (if not thoughts, but all I can go from is the words) that doesn't work in the business. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 2:53 pm
Supreme Court, in Staub v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:00 pm
From Patrick v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 11:07 pm
[Note: This post is Part V of a series on amending the BCP and adopting trial or experimental liturgies for use in the Church, as we head into General Convention LXXVII later this week. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:33 am
After changing his clothing, [Benedict] lay down on the bed with [her], kissed her, squeezed her breasts and fell asleep. [read post]
