Search for: "Love v. State" Results 5281 - 5300 of 9,059
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Otherwise, what does it matter where the employee cares for a loved one? [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Otherwise, what does it matter where the employee cares for a loved one? [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:24 am by Howard Friedman
A news release from Hawaii's Department of Attorney General reports that on Jan. 29 a state trial court judge upheld the constitutionality under both the state and federal constitutions of Hawaii's Marriage Equality Act of 2013:In his ruling from the bench, Judge Sakamoto noted the importance of marriage under the federal constitution, drawing an analogy to Loving v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 6:24 am by Joy Waltemath
Fact questions existed as to whether cleaning patient discharge rooms in 30 to 45 minutes was an essential function of the ESA position or whether the cleaning standards unlawfully screened out disabled persons (Dupont v Allina Health System, January 28, 2014, Davis, M). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm by Jon Markman
It is impossible to write a rule or law that perfectly and permanently fits the ever-changing state of communications technology. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Amongst others, lovers of all things copyright levies are probably looking forward to the decision in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi [on which see 1709 Blog post here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from apparent copyright-loving Member State Denmark, seeking clarification as to copyright levies and their calculation, including consideration of technological protection measures [on TPMs, see the recent decision in Case… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:40 am
This morning Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion in Case C‑583/12 Sintax Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a request to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus, Estonia. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY – VANDALISM – INTENT & STATE OF MIND OF THE VANDAL – MALICEGeorgitsi Realty, LLC v Penn-Star Ins. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:08 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Then in 1967, SCOTUS decided Loving v Virginia striking down the state law prohibiting interracial marriages.Even in announcing that his office will no longer oppose the pending legal challenge to the Commonwealth's ban on same-sex marriage, AG Herring stated that Virginia would continue to enforce the ban until the federal court rules on the case next week. [read post]