Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2017, 1:11 pm
But whatever the merits of those positions as a policy matter, it’s clear that the RFRA embodies a different view. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:17 pm
(b) GOOD FAITH DEFENSE. [read post]
6 May 2012, 4:37 am
Our integrity mattered, to us regardless of whether it mattered to anyone else. [read post]
1 Aug 2006, 9:42 pm
T. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:06 am
You may have levers that weren’t available to you before. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:23 am
” However, both the ALJ’s Initial Decision and the FTC Opinion were admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 201(b) and Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(A)(iii). [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm
He simply didn't care all that much (as I suspect is the case with Etch-a-sketch Mitt on abortion) and bent to the political realities of the then-Democratic Party, which Lyndon B. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Don’t get us wrong. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:47 am
I don't say this often, but read the whole thing. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:20 am
It cannot be denied that (a) many South Asians own convenience stores and (b) many are held up at gunpoint. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
The case is In the Matter of D.K.; it was decided by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020, but I hadn't noticed it then, and just learned about it because of a new decision that cited it. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
R (T) v (1) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Secretary of State for Justice an interested party) [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) – read judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:55 am
One of the cases from 2012 that has caught my attention is The Matter of David P. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:40 am
The defendants moved to dismiss the case, filing a motion under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, arguing that the case raised non-justiciable political questions. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
No, this is a somewhat arcane matter of constitutional law that rarely gets litigated (just because it's so unusual to be implicated). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:03 am
R. 14(B)(1)(a). [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
And there was the matter of the skipped grade, which might or might not be an Asian fixation. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:17 pm
The following limitations apply (meaning you can’t get the following expunged): (a) two or more felony convictions, each of which is contained in a separate criminal episode; (b) any combination of three or more convictions that include two class A misdemeanor convictions, each of which is contained in a separate criminal episode; (c) any combination of four or more convictions that include three class B misdemeanor convictions, each of which is… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
Merely providing specifications and financing doesn’t do the trick. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:52 am
Identity theft charges can be daunting, but you don’t have to face them alone. [read post]
