Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5281 - 5300 of 21,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am by Conor McEvily
At Education Week’s School Law blog, Mark Walsh observes that the “lengthy gestation period” of the Court’s forthcoming decision in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Therefore a proper allegation of nonuse should state that the marks were not in use as of those later dates. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:23 am by John W. Arden
This posting was written by Mark Engstrom, Editor of CCH RICO Business Disputes Guide. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Jason Rantanen
Sequenom marks a critical juncture in the development of a modern patent-eligibility framework. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 7:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Commentary and coverage focus on the Supreme Court’s decision last week to review New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 12:28 pm
State, 869 So. 2d 650, 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citations omitted) (some internal punctuation marks omitted) (in context of comments made by prosecutor during closing argument). [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by Marissa Miller
Shawn Turner at Hotel News Now previews RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]