Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 5,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm
Perhaps…and You Can Help (URGENT CALL TO ACTION) * Congress Probably Will Ruin Section 230 This Week (SESTA/FOSTA Updates) * What’s New With SESTA/FOSTA (January 17, 2018 edition) * New House Bill (Substitute FOSTA) Has More Promising Approach to Regulating Online Sex Trafficking * My testimony at the House Energy & Commerce Committee: Balancing Section 230 and Anti-Sex Trafficking Initiatives * How SESTA Undermines Section 230’s Good Samaritan… [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:03 am
Business groups applauded the ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The saga of Case C 208/09 Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien, in which the court gave its ruling on 22 December, all began in Vienna, Austria, in 1944 where Ilonka was born, instantly becoming an Austrian citizen. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:55 am
Coates v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:38 am
Filed in 2017 with the New York Supreme Court and titled Herman v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
McCommons v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:01 am
., People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
More SESTA-Related Posts: * Debunking Some Myths About Section 230 and Sex Trafficking (Guest Blog Post) * Congress Is About To Ruin Its Online Free Speech Masterpiece (Cross-Post) * Backpage Executives Must Face Money Laundering Charges Despite Section 230–People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
My right to life liberty and security of the person may not provide a "right to bear arms" as for our neighbours to the south, but a protective vest presents no risk of harm to anyone, and using my desire to protect myself from harm as a way to purportedly subject me to what would clearly otherwise be an unlawful detention and search simply crosses the line.Wake up Alberta.Oh, and in case you still think I am just being some kind of alarmist, for fun, have a read of the judgment… [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm
DePyper v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:42 am
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am
Further, in 1993, in McGimpsey case (most extensively discussed by Clive Symmons) the court itself ignored its earlier comments, and waved through the Anglo Irish agreement without constitutional referendum, despite its obligations to participate in cross border bodies. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
It makes people stupider. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
" You can't cross-examine a database and often the information they contain comes from many different, frequently untraceable sources that may not be correct or complete.In Texas this is a particularly salient issue because many jurisdictions have a bad habit of reporting arrests to the statewide data system but fail to report the outcome of the cases. [read post]
27 Oct 2024, 8:34 pm
Doe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:17 am
The internet was developed by people who clearly knew and loved Adam’s books. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
One should not expect people to accept arguments just because they are valid. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
