Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 5281 - 5300 of 5,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by GuestPost
The ‘Junk’ decision in 2005 (C-188/03, Junk v Kuhnel) has meant, that worker consultations need now take place before any final decision on job losses is taken. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm by Carolyn Elefant
In some law firms, half sleeves are not at all appropriate, whereas in other law firms, they’re fine. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 3:36 pm by familoo
My experience suggests that it isn’t always lack of software though – sometimes it is just people not knowing how to work it. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:01 am by Reid Trautz
Another fine book is the recently published The E-Myth Attorney. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:11 am by Rick Hasen
  I wish them the best of luck on their new endeavors, and will miss the fine research produced by CGS. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:26 am by Orin Kerr
That’s usually fine, as we mostly only worry about briefcases accidentally coming open or pickpockets reaching in a hand. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
License + IP right is modularization, but must be combined with contract that allows you, not necessarily to expand the grant you got, but to fine-tune the relationship in customized way to regulate info flow between third parties who otherwise lack reliable instrument to do that. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
She is on all kinds of boards, all kinds of journals, she is one of those people who really think to the future, and always think of the problems ahead. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
All right -- normally I do not engage laypersons who are ignorant of the law, but in this case (because so many people are being misled), I shall make an exception to that policy. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
On July 2, 1976, in deciding the case of Gregg v Georgia, the Supreme Court legalised capital punishment after a decade-long moratorium on executions. [read post]