Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 5281 - 5300 of 178,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2021, 6:59 am by Howard Wasserman
Whole Women's Health sued Dickson because his public advocacy of SB8 and of SB8 suits made him a "likely" plaintiff. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by The Docket Navigator
The magistrate judge recommended denying defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's infringement claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis that plaintiff's "status as a limited partnership [had been] terminated by the Texas Secretary of State. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
[Plaintiff's] refusal to stipulate or dismiss its claims was in bad faith because it unjustifiably expended the parties’ and Court’s time and resources and delayed judgment. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Kunkel's lawyer said that about half of his clients have contracted the disease. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But I digress.It's very easy to get to four votes for the proposition that the federal conscience objection means the plaintiffs' claim for standing fails at step (C). [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 5:47 am by Gregory B. Williams
March 31, 2020), following a two day bench trial and post-trial briefing in the action filed by plaintiff Belcher under the Hatch-Waxman Act as a result of defendant Hospira’s attempt to bring to market a bioequivalent of plaintiffs product, the Court ruled in favor of defendant Hospira concluding that (1) defendant Hospira’s product does not infringe U.S. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:02 pm by Scott Pringle
The post After McKennon Law Group PC Aggressively Pursues Fee Motion, District Judge Awards Plaintiff in ERISA Disability Case Nearly $130,000 in Attorneys’ Fees and Costs appeared first on McKennon Law Group. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:52 pm by Shorstein & Lasnetski
This work product privilege can be overcome if the plaintiff's lawyer can show that the plaintiff needs the information in the report and the plaintiff cannot obtain such information without undue hardship. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:54 am by emagraken
I also accept the plaintiffs counsel’s argument that in the circumstances of any particular case, it may be possible for a plaintiff to establish that reasonable care equates with a very high standard of care. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:19 am by Sean Wajert
Marcotte, 907 So. 2d 596, 598-99 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), defendant moved for a directed verdict on plaintiff's strict liability and negligence claims. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:01 pm by Doug Austin
Johnston denied the defendants’ Motion for Leave to Amend their counterclaim to remove their own defamation counterclaim (Count VIII) against the plaintiffs – a move to which the plaintiffs objected, because it could eliminate their chance to pursue sanctions against the defendants for ESI spoliation. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Martinez ruled that “Plaintiffs loss or destruction of the complete recording of the June 3, 2013 conversation [between the plaintiff and his supervisors] constitutes sanctionable spoliation of evidence”, but rejected the defendants’ request to make a finding of bad faith and to give the jury an adverse inference instruction, opting instead for permitting the defendants to...Read the whole entry... [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
The plaintiffs also persist in conflating the defendant's daughter's infringement with liability on the part of the defendant. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiffs claims are inexorably intertwined with defendant’s investigation as to whether he was fit to serve as a pastor, given the accusation of sexual misconduct against him. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:45 am by Eric Goldman
Losing the lawsuit isn’t great for the plaintiff, but if the plaintiffs lawyer worked on contingency (which I’m assuming is the case), then a loss on the merits means the plaintiff only lost some upside. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Evan Brown
Plaintiff sued defendant Urban Outfitters under California law over the way that the retailer routed messages sent using the company’s website. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 9:19 am by John L. Mays, Attorney at Law
The plaintiffs further alleged that the defendant’s practices also affected other similarly situated workers employed. [read post]