Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE" Results 5281 - 5300 of 7,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2020, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) laments that after the court’s decision on Monday to dismiss as moot a high-profile Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
In any event, the practice in many States already accords with today's decision, and the serious disruption predicted by respondent and the dissent has not materialized.The other case is Safford United School District # 1 v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
Separate opinion utility Looking back at some of the most impactful dissents as measured using Cole’s criteria, Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent from Bowers v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:48 am
One would have thought after Lawrence, and particularly after Justice Kennedy's quote from Justice Stevens' dissent in Bowers v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel has a video preview of New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
Board of Trustees of California State University (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 359 (Horsford). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:03 pm by Lawrence Taylor
They are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost laments that the ruling in The American Legion v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:28 pm by Michael W. Lewis
Does the fact that the United States has gone to great lengths to make it clear that NATO is in charge of the operation lend weight to viewing this conflict as NATO v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am by Anna Christensen
Finally, at Slate, Rick Hasen comments on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]