Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
., v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
“International relations” was not a basis for distinguishing Bauman(which it refers to as “Daimler”):Daimler is binding precedent from the United States Supreme Court which this Court is bound to follow. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
Riley, 488 U.S. 445, 449-50 (1989); California v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am
California Teachers Association presents two issues: (1) whether to overrule Abood v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:41 pm
The City of Hayward, California, was concerned that residential rentals within its borders were "decent, safe, and sanitary," and by ordinance required the owners or tenants of such units to allow city officials to inspect them. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
United States, 370 U.S. 294, 326, 82 S. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
Additional coverage comes from John Myers in the Los Angeles Times, who reports that California is one of 11 states that filed a brief opposing the Ohio system, and from Sabrina Eaton at Cleveland.com, who reports that Sen. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Take Our Poll (5) United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:26 pm
"We don't run the United States the way we run New England town meetings. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:40 pm
In March 2020, in Salzberg v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court in Cable Connection, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
United States and Town of Vernon v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:01 pm
The Court found, in a 2-1 decision, that in 2020, the United States District Court for California, Southern District (San Diego) had abused its discretion when it enjoined the State of California from enforcing AB-5 against motor carriers doing business in California (on the ground that such enforcement was preempted by F4A) (our prior article on the District Court’s ruling can be read here). [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:59 pm
So far, no federal court of appeals has issued a final ruling on the issue since the Supreme Court’s decision last June, in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
United States Dep't of Agriculture, 673 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:26 am
(Wesch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
I personally know lawyers in Texas, California and other states who refuse medical malpractice cases altogether. [read post]
