Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 5:18 pm
In People v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 8:26 am
In a case reported in last week's New York Law Journal, Midland Funding, LLC DBA in New York as Midland Funding of Delaware, LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm
In Hobbs v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 10:03 am
Wimmer v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:07 am
One such instance occurred recently when a cartoonist tried to sue the BBC for millions by claiming that CBeebies bosses copied his characters: Michael Mitchell v BBC [2011] EWPCC 42. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Balzourt v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:51 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:58 am
In T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:57 am
To survive strict scrutiny, the Government has the burden of showing that a content-based restriction `is necessary to serve a compelling state interest. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:05 am
(b) Is a court of a Member State permitted to apply a national provision (here the second sentence of Paragraph 26(3) of the Law on trade marks (MarkenG)) which conflicts with a provision of a directive (here Article 10(1) and (2)(a) of Directive 89/104/EEC) in cases in which the facts of the case had already occurred prior to a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in which indications of the incompatibility of the Member State's legislation with the… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Patent No. 5,381,489 entitled OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION METHOD AND APPARATUS and owned by Nuance Communications. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Patent No. 5,381,489 entitled OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION METHOD AND APPARATUS and owned by Nuance Communications. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
US District Court for the District of Maryland: US v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:50 am
People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
My latest Verdict column offers a thus-far-overlooked ground for the Supreme Court to rule for the federal government in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court entertained oral argument in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:35 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
