Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 5281 - 5300
of 6,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2009, 5:11 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:12 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
In her concurring opinion in State of Oregon v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
This is about United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:21 am
Bjorklund (Univ. of California, Davis - Law), "State Immunity and the Enforcement of Investor-State Arbitral Awards"April 3, 2009: Paul Stephan (Univ. of Virginia - Law), "Privatizing International Law"April 17, 2009: Rachel Brewster (Harvard Univ. - Law), "Trade and Climate Change: Conflicts and Solutions" [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 5:16 am
However, the execution of an innocent man isthe ultimative catastrophe in a civilized country and society since itcan happen to any of us.The cases of Troy Davis in Georgia and Jeff Wood in Texas shown so farwhat is possible when people stand up, and we're watching the developmentof these cases intently from Europe. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:46 am
The article reports on United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:39 pm
He first offered the position to Danny Davis, a black member of the House of Representatives, but Davis turned down the offer. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:12 am
I blogged yesterday about the Sixth Circuit's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 7:12 am
On December 19, the Sixth Circuit handed down a remarkable decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 9:05 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
December 19, 2008)Dismissing Petition for review of FAA order denying exemption from Pilot Age 60 RuleCAFC* Davis v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Davis, No. 07-1964 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although a vehicular safety statute involving dangling ornaments that police relied upon to make the stop at issue was unconstitutionally vague; 2) nevertheless, the exclusionary rule did not apply as police were relying in good faith on a presumptively valid statute. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Davis, 4850, 607/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 9897; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:46 am
Davis would have disclosed to Dr. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
Here is Justice Alito’s introduction in Davis v. [read post]
