Search for: "State v. Dollar"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 9,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
For the State Department list, which can be found on the State Department website and in the Federal Register, see here. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 12:00 am
The preamble also notes that “studies show that each dollar spent to mitigate hazards, including those associated with climate change impacts, results in a six-fold decrease in spending on recovery. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
The only related case Qualcomm has notified the court of is Apple v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
E.g., Frio v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 873-74 (1989); see also Fed. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
While these criminal defendants might well have been prosecuted successfully simply for untrue statements, see generally United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:58 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:22 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
The right to trial by jury is enshrined in the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, in relevant part: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved…. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
The parties had submitted a redacted version to OSHA that blacked out the dollar amounts to be paid. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:00 pm
"As North Carolina continues to be deeply affected by this national recession, state government must ensure that every tax dollar is used as efficiently and wisely as possible," Perdue said. [read post]
