Search for: "State v. Files"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 91,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm
There is a serious side to this case – Ohio is, after all, the state whose right of publicity laws produced Zacchini v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm
As I understand it, this lawsuit was filed to try and blunt the impact of AHM v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:58 am
ShareTuesday’s decision in Wilkins v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:55 am
In a recently filed case, Andersen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am
A new race discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:33 am
The Crew Members Exchanged Graphic Child Pornography and Discussed Violent Sexual Abuse of Children Portions of the criminal files against Crow (United States of America v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
Flores v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:09 am
Ambiguity with respect to the way in which the UFLPA does or does not apply to an importer’s particular transactional circumstances can be preemptively resolved pursuant to the filing of a ruling request with CBP. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am
Registration Sys., Inc. v McVicar, 203 AD3d 919 [2d Dept 2022]). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:50 am
The most famous decision might be the UK Supreme Court’s Ruling in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd, which was reported on this blog here. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given those discrepancies, the appellate court concluded that Corrections lacked a bonafide basis to withhold the requested footage and remitted the matter to the Albany County Supreme Court for a determination as to the fees and costs awardable to PLS, given its prevailing party status here.Looks like that FOIL foolishness got flogged.# # #Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This filing would be made on a confidential basis—the SEC would not make the filings public to the extent permitted by law—and must be made “promptly” but no later than within 48 hours upon having a reasonable basis to conclude that a significant cybersecurity incident has occurred or is occurring. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:02 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 4:59 pm
V. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm
Wil Wilkins, one of the plaintiffs in Wilkins v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 8:12 am
Thus, Muller v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:43 am
Within those NIETCs, the law allowed FERC to issue federal permits for transmission, in place of state permits, if a state permit application had not been approved within one year of filing. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:52 am
See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:46 am
SCOTT V. [read post]
