Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 9,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
The first case is United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
The first new relist is a biggie: NACS v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:30 pm
A number of district courts have found the question of the Insured v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:49 am
The Southern District Court of New York was the first to respond to the reconsideration motion from Sirius, and it did not sound happy. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
(For a prior post on that case, see “First District Publishes Significant CEQA Decision On Legal Feasibility Of Mitigation For Prime Farmland Losses In Masonite Corporation v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Constitution – Third Bite at the Apple: First, we had Stern v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:35 am
For example, libertarians and conservatives worked together to expand judicial protection for Second Amendment rights in District of Columbia v> Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
`First, . . . [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 12:37 pm
The court declined to follow the First District’s decision in TTX Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:34 am
We may be on the verge of seeing that issue decided.On December 3, 2014, the California Court of Appeal First Appellate District Division One granted the petition for writ of review filed San Francisco attorney Joseph Waxman on behalf of Frances Stevens (the case is Frances Stevens, Petitioner, v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:49 pm
Crawford County Oil v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:44 am
This approach, and its harmonious interpretation of the purported contradictory language, is more appropriate than a judicially created exception to an unambiguous text, the district court stated. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:27 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Harris 14-407Issue: Whether, if a state appellate court rejects an unpreserved federal claim after assessing whether the “plain error” exception to state preservation requirements permitted review, but does not explain its reasoning, a federal habeas court should conclude that the state court ruled on the federal claim’s merits, such that federal court review is appropriate. [read post]
