Search for: "State v. Greening"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 6,666
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Midcounties Co-Operative Ltd, R (on the application of) v Tesco Stores Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 841 (29 July 2010) Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908 (29 July 2010) Aylott v Stockton- On- Tees Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 910 (29 July 2010) GR & Ors (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 871 (29 July 2010) W (Algeria) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 898 (29 July… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
City of Green Bay, 168 F.3d 1013, 1019 (7th Cir.1999); see also Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
R (on the application of ZO (Somalia) and others) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 36 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the UK must provide minimum standards to asylum seekers, including the right to work, whether or not their first asylum application has failed. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:14 am
Supreme Court Morrison Sports Ltd & Ors v Scottish Power [2010] UKSC 37 (28 July 2010) Star Energy Weald Basin Ltd & Anor v Bocardo SA [2010] UKSC 35 (28 July 2010) O’ Brien v Ministry of Justice [2010] UKSC 34 (28 July 2010) ZO (Somalia) & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 36 (28 July 2010) Rollins, R v [2010] UKSC 39 (28 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
Whereas the statutory tenancy is unassignable, not an estate in land but a mere "personal right of occupation" (see Lord Greene MR in Carter v SU Carburetter Co [1942] 2 KB 288, 291), a secure tenancy is an orthodox estate in land which, subject to specific restrictions in the 1980 Act, can be assigned, held in joint names, pass by survivorship and be disposed of by will on death. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
Whereas the statutory tenancy is unassignable, not an estate in land but a mere "personal right of occupation" (see Lord Greene MR in Carter v SU Carburetter Co [1942] 2 KB 288, 291), a secure tenancy is an orthodox estate in land which, subject to specific restrictions in the 1980 Act, can be assigned, held in joint names, pass by survivorship and be disposed of by will on death. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:56 pm
However, FDA stated that stronger, more credible studies did not show an effect of green tea on either prostate or breast cancer. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
In Ostergren v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
In an opinion from Thursday in Delta Regional Medical Center v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
The ADA requires that individuals with disabilities be provided services in the most integrated setting appropriate, as determined by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision Olmstead v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:21 am
Intertape Polymer Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:31 am
Here is an example from today's NYLJ: Uzamere v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:14 pm
The following is an actual series of texts between an assistant public defender (in green) and an assistant state attorney (in white). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
In South Yuba River Citizens League v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:49 am
The Second Circuit holds that some of these provisions violate the First Amendment and are therefore unconstitutional.The case is Green Party of Connecticut v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Distinguished voices have recently been heard to query whether Greene v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
This judgment sets the clock back to the days of Dixon of Dock Green. [read post]
