Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 16,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2021, 6:32 pm
This kind of child support is called “non-minor support. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm
However, in Ennabe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Those disclosure failures meant that the minority stockholders were not adequately informed, and that the transaction was not eligible for the safe harbor of the MFW framework (City of Dearborn Police and Fire Revised Retirement System (Chapter 23) v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm
Queer Career rectifies this, offering an expansive historical look at sexual minorities in the modern American workforce. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Gold v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
‘What works’ to protect children on the move: five insights from across the globe (ODI Blog, Dec. 2020) [text]Reports:Caring for unaccompanied minors in transit in Serbia, RLI Working Paper, no. 51 (Refugee Law Initiative, Nov. 2020) [text]Children Affected by Armed Conflict, 1990–2019 (PRIO, Nov. 2020) [text]A Path to Reintegration: The Role of Handover Protocols in Protecting the Rights of Children Formerly Associated with Armed Forces or Armed Groups (Watchlist on… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:47 am
Humphrey v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:14 am
See, Kahn v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:06 pm
Assange v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am
In response to minority questions, [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:12 pm
" The decision in Adar, et al v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:49 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
Several state laws regulating minors' access to pornography online have survived Dormant Commerce Clause scrutiny because they criminalize only intentional transmissions of banned materials to minors or to minors within a state.[5] For similar reasons, Dormant Commerce Clause concerns are significantly reduced if state law provides a defense for reasonable efforts to keep forbidden internet content out of the state. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:15 am
By Joshua Scott Chilton, Legal Assistant & Receptionist, Woodruff Family Law Group On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States of America made a ruling in a case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
In CareFlite v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
In the case of Mr Catt, the Supreme Court found, inter alia, that the interference with Mr Catt’s private life had been minor. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
Olmstead v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Roe v. [read post]
