Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 5,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 4:34 am
United States, 314 U.S. 583 (1941) and North American Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:13 pm
Perhaps the debate in the United States can reignite our efforts to better understand what is happening at the international level. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
Finally, the Supreme Court has not really taken a significant state sovereign immunity case since Justice O'Connor's parting gift in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:04 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I explain why Monday's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:19 am
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
The court referred to its holding in Roper v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 pm
So, I suppose Justice Sotomayor, contrary to her Senate testimony, is okay with the use of international precedent to strike down laws passed by 37 states. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
We don't kill kids (Roper v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:56 pm
The NYT's "Room for Debate" feature has a short piece by yours truly on Graham v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:25 am
Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor grounded the holding exclusively on domestic law. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:18 am
A victory for Justice Sotomayor Second, the case represents a victory for Justice Sotomayor, who, as I’ve noted before, dissented in the leading Court of Appeals decision on this topic, Croll v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:08 am
I thought Justice Sotomayor would join the dissent based upon the oral argument, but it looks like Orin Kerr called the lineup exactly right with only Justices Scalia and Thomas dissenting (if my memory is right). [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:58 am
Supreme Court released its opinion in Graham v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:30 am
The ruling in Graham v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:07 am
The case, Wall v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am
The rulings are: In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am
Justice Sotomayor gave a speech to the graduates of St. [read post]
16 May 2010, 5:25 pm
In some state judiciaries, liberal judges have voted to enforce tight state constitutional restrictions on eminent domain and exclusionary zoning, a point I discussed in the last part of this article. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:38 pm
Ashcroft and other federal officials, came in the case of Arar v. [read post]
