Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 16,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 2:25 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
Yet there may be particularly strong reasons for the Supreme Court to exercise its jurisdiction were a state to move for leave to file. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am
White v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 5:46 am
In 1997, the Austin Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:44 am
(State ex rel Shevin v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
In March, in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
On top of all that, there appears to be a strong federal interest, because the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am
United States. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:11 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:00 am
This precedent did not hold for New York State bakers in Lochner v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
A description of applicable federal laws and policies, and applicable state laws, including new or proposed federal or state legislation or policies5. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:13 pm
Indeed, non-state actors - who are often financially strong, technologically well-equipped and highly organised - attack states in ways that previously only nation states were capable of. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:49 pm
” Count V “does not explicitly refer to any trade secrets in Count V” and “does not even specifically use the term trade secrets. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:45 am
New case: Lewis v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:09 am
As the court explained in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:44 am
In Frank v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:22 pm
” Pfaff v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 11:12 am
Supreme Court ruling in Davis v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
And for Geof, modern episodes of hate speech are often similar to the controversy over the Viet Nam War—people have understandably strong opinions about such episodes, but the university’s role is to ensure that individuals get to air those opinions, not to shape or influence them by university imprimaturs or condemnations. [read post]