Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 5281 - 5300 of 7,749
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2012, Tugendhat J heard an application in Iqbal v Mansoor & ors and gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
This Kat has watched many cooking shows produced by Heston Blumenthal but has not yet been to The Fat Duck Restaurant (cheeky hint-hint if you, Heston, or your people are reading this). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:53 am by Ken
Marc doesn't just defend people he agrees with or likes. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
On Friday 9 March 2012, Eady J heard another application to amend the defence in the case of Hunt v Times Newspap [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Cases to look out for A number of important human rights cases are currently being heard in the Strasbourg court and the UK courts. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Henry Oliver
When the House of Lords gave the Home Secretary permission to arrest and detain people indefinitely during World War II (Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1) Lord Atkin gave a powerful dissenting speech: “In this county, amid the clash of arms, the law is not silent. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am by INFORRM
On the same day Bean J heard the “offer of amends” case of KC v MGN Ltd – a claim by the natural father of “Baby P” wrongly accused in The People of being a sex offender convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by NL
This may be one of the more esoteric points to be heard by the Court of Appeal on terms of a lease, but one of the issues in Newman v Framewood Manor Management Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 159 was whether Mrs Newman was entitled to damages for loss of amenity for not being provided with a contractual jacuzzi but rather a sauna by the Defendant lessor. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by NL
This may be one of the more esoteric points to be heard by the Court of Appeal on terms of a lease, but one of the issues in Newman v Framewood Manor Management Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 159 was whether Mrs Newman was entitled to damages for loss of amenity for not being provided with a contractual jacuzzi but rather a sauna by the Defendant lessor. [read post]