Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 6,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
Brash’s lawyers in the case, David Brash v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:55 am
By: David A. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage notes that, in his concurring opinion in Connick, Justice Scalia cited the Court’s 1988 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
One of the cases which would no doubt encourage David Cameron and Jack Straw in that view is the very recent case of Hassan-Daniel v HMRC [2010] EWCA Civ 1443. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:28 pm
Neoliberalism v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
One -- at the crack of dawn on Monday morning -- is a chance to share a breakfast with the early-rising Head of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, David Kappos (details here). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
" Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) said, "President Obama is right to say our nation needs to safely and responsibly develop and produce oil and natural gas in the United States while protecting our environment, and right to say we need to develop a wide range of energy sources for the future. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
In Elsevier N.V. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am
” Robert Barnes of the Washington Post sets McComish in the context of Citizens United, while David Savage and Nicholas Riccardi of the Los Angeles Times tell the story of David Schapira, “the youngest member of the state Senate as well as its Democratic leader, [who] credits his rapid rise in politics to the Clean Elections Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
The parties were not given the opportunity to comment on the original Panel’s own Google and United States Patent and Trademark Office searches in Sensis I. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
” Baffa v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
by David Muradyan Is Apple, Inc. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
For example the Department of Justice press release added this statement, “… and to insure a singular monetary system for all purchases and debts in the United States, public and private” to their quote of Article 1, section 8 clause 5 of the US Constitution, when no such law or even idea, exists outside of the hyperbole of the DOJ. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:48 pm
Previously, attention had focused mainly on a few major state court cases, along with Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
