Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:17 pm
Cephalon, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
The key is instead what relationship a right must bear to “citizens of the United States” in order to count - that is, the meaning of “of. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
The crossing, at the Upper Lars checkpoint in the Caucasus mountains, has been closed since 2006, when relations began growing tense, in part because of efforts by the Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, to align himself more closely with the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:55 am
' Is the principle of state sovereignty challenged not only by a single people, but also by international organizations? [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
United States, suppression would not have been warranted because the United States Constitution allows for what is known as the “good faith” exception. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm
Lymas contends that the damage caps violate the Mississippi Constitution and the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
At least when those clauses underlie a foreign judgment that is submitted for recognition in the United States, however, the legislation implementing the Hague Choice of Courts Convention should force some much-needed harmony into the field. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm
The key is instead what relationship a right must bear to “citizens of the United States” in order to count - that is, the meaning of “of. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
 Obama and the Democrats would deliver the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
Bush to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has finally held that the mark is generic and not entitled to registration. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has finally held that the mark is generic and not entitled to registration. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:32 am
Mere Descriptiveness: Both Opposers testified that they escaped from Cuba to the United States in a program organized by the United States government and dubbed "Operation Pedro Pan. [read post]
