Search for: "United States v. Was" Results 5281 - 5300 of 102,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 11:57 am by Ilya Somin
United States (2012), which established a multifactor balancing test for most flooding takings cases, in this article, published soon after the decision came down. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am by Josh Blackman
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am by Garrett West
United States, 524 U.S. 125, 129 (1998); Japan Whaling Association v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:15 am by Lawrence Solum
The court compounded this shoddy analysis by copying the United States Supreme Court’s approach in due process cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
An Acoba spokesperson explained “the Ministerial Code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
If we assume that utility functions yield values expressed in units of utility or utiles, then individual's utility function might score state of affairs P at 80 utiles and state of affairs Q at 120 utiles. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm by Josh Blackman
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]