Search for: "W. D." Results 5281 - 5300 of 13,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2011, 3:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Here, the court held that some claim construction is necessary: "[W]e conclude that … the patent eligibility of at least one of the asserted claims turns on questions of claim construction that the district court did not have the opportunity to address. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 pm by Marcel Pemsel
Audi sued the defendant before the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Regional Court of Warsaw) for trade mark infringement. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:38 pm
Just Canadian enough to be noticeably off, but also rah-rah in a George W. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:26 pm by Michael Lowe
In 1986, Congress passed the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 USC §1030, that defines both civil and criminal liability for “…[w]hoever . [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Apr 6: Following the release of a report by the Department of Energy that shows a renewable energy incentive program created tens of thousands of jobs, Representative Ed Markey (D-MA) challenged House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and other Republicans to support the development of American clean energy and end unnecessary tax subsidies for the biggest oil companies. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:07 am by Steve Vladeck
 Thus, I thought I'd take a minute to blog about the Government's very significant brief in response to the Petition for Rehearing En Banc in al-Bihani v. [read post]
Wozniak’s lawyer responded by saying, “[w]e respectfully disagree with the court’s decision and are considering our next steps. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
Afterwards we made our way into the center city for a traditional meal of Würstchen, Kartoffeln und Sauerkraut. [read post]
In adopting the ALJ’s Recommended Order in S&S Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Heating, Case No. 09-CA-235304, the NLRB found that a leaflet distributed by the employer during union organizing efforts, which stated that it is against federal law for a labor union to threaten employees, did not violate the NLRA because it did not constitute the promulgation and maintenance of a new policy, as the union alleged. [read post]