Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 60,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2007, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:33 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:56 am
This post is entirely his work. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:19 am
According to the lawsuit, Brown fell down stairs while working aboard the M/V Maersk Texas in early 2010. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:25 am
In Price v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 8:38 am
The Court applied the test set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Newfoundland and Labrador v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:10 am
The Court of Justice this morning gave its ruling in Joined Cases C-457/11 to C-460/11 Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort) v Kyocera, Epson Deutschland GmbH, Xerox GmbH, Canon Deutschland GmbH and Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH, Hewlett-Packard GmbH v VG Wort -- as impressive a line-up of litigants as you could hope for. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:13 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:51 pm
The state is also one of 23 states to join the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement, a voluntary governing board that has worked to simplify and standardize their sales tax rules. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm
This work probably should have been done before her initial story ran. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:22 am
The Court expressly rejected the definition that “supervisor” status is equated with the ability to exercise “significant direction over another’s daily work” which was advocated by the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:51 pm
State of Oklahoma (Reservation Boundaries; Criminal Jurisdiction) Hogner v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 12:44 am
The Second Circuit is putting the New York State Court of Appeals back to work by certifying some more questions. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
July 1998 - Classic Typos(1) From "a reprint of Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 8:23 am
To overcome this, the state AG invoked the Fifth Circuit opinion in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]