Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 5301 - 5320 of 191,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 9:42 am by Ann Carlson
Headlines about today’s decision in Loper v Raimondo overturning the 40 year-old decision in Chevron v NRDC that granted agencies deference in their interpretation of ambiguous statutes  focus on the “massive power grab,” the decision’s “sweeping” nature and call it a  “blow” to the administrative state. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 5:08 am by John L. Welch
On March 31, 2010, the TTAB issued an Order resuming proceedings in its oldest pending case: United Black Fund v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Matthew Wentworth-May
This had been an error of law, and the UT had been right to overturn its decision. [read post]
22 May 2008, 10:03 am
NYC’s lawsuit against gun retailers in the south has been billed as a David v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:02 am
Supreme Court's review of the Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:14 am by Tom Smith
The press has been spinning Justice Gorsuch’s vote in favor of a resident alien in Dimaya v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:50 am by Timothy J. Maier
We are still waiting for Bilski v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:35 am by Editorial Board
On February 25, the European Parliament published a press release announcing that political agreement has been reached with the Council of the EU on the proposed UCITS V Directive. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:45 am by Ray Beckerman
A new case has been commenced, in federal court in San Jose, California, by filesharing service MegaUpload, against Universal Music Group, accusing it of issuing an improper DMCA takedown notice to YouTube, for the takedown of a promotional video for which MegaUpload claimed to have cleared all necessary rights.ComplaintKeywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture… [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:53 am
However, it is imperative that we address the larger, more significant question that has been churned out from the incident. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:46 am by traceydennis
” WLR Daily, 29th March 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:44 am by traceydennis
” WLR Daily, 16th December 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:55 am by sally
The judge was not obliged to consider what view a notional team that included a medicinal chemist, pharmacologists and biochemists would take as to the issue of obviousness or whether something would have been ‘obvious to try’.” WLR Daily, 7th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:45 am by sally
” WLR Daily, 26th April 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:17 am
Taxpayer not entitled to reduce VAT Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v BUPA Purchasing Ltd and Others Court of Appeal “Where the Commissioners for Revenue and Custome had made a value-added tax assessment and the time limit for making any further assessment had passed before they became aware that further input tax was deductible, the taxpayer was not entitled to reduce the amount of VAT stated due in the assessment to take account of output tax which had not yet… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:21 am by sally
” WLR Daily, 8th December 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]