Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 21,835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Mr O’Neill QC clarifies, that is reduction of the Order of Counsel dated 28 August 2019. 1550: Mr O’Neill QC states that Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689 is not to be used in a manner to ‘coax executive action’. 1548: Aidan O’Neill QC states that there is suggestion of a remedy being a matter for the discretion of the court by using ‘equitable judgment’. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:42 am
AB 5 codifies the “ABC” test for employee status adopted by the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
The details of the complaint remain vague, but Schiff stated that it was filed by an individual in the intelligence community and determined by Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson to be credible and a matter of “urgent concern. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC notes that the author of the article was acting as private individual working for a publication and not in her separate role as an adviser to the Prime Minister. 15:32 Lord Keen QC is discussing the historical process of parliament sitting for 2 or 3 weeks prior to the recess for the conference session in the context of the cabinet memo considering prorogation. 15:30: Lord Keen QC is currently discussing the consideration of bills being carried over when deciding to… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm
The state supreme court ruled that the previous test for independent contractor v. employee needed to be further clarified for those working in these types of jobs. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:52 am
The Court noted in its order granting MRNISO’s motion that in Fogerty v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm
Prior to the licensing of paralegals in Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the issue of agents in R. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm
The bill expressly calls for the exclusion of evidence so obtained as an express violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and section 11 of article 1 of Michigan's constitution.This bill, of course, represents the other end of the spectrum. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 8:48 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
As the Electronic Frontier Foundation accurately stated, that bill "would make bad patents stronger than ever. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:25 pm
” Hines v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:52 pm
See Lewis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Bernhardt (Land Into Trust)Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:03 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
Choice between federal and state courts implicates fundamental questions of fairness [Eric Alexander, Drug and Device Law on Supreme Court certiorari petition in Pfizer v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:19 pm
Bernhardt (Land Into Trust) Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:19 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
