Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 5,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2008, 10:31 am
The false alarms didn't cause physical harm to anyone, nor does it seem that the perpetrator was trying to cause such harm. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:30 am
The Board, without deciding whether priority may be based on an eBay user ID, concluded that Opposer's testimony was ambiguous and its documentary evidence failed to show use earlier than 2005.The Board ruled that Applicant has priority vis-a-vis Opposer's GOGAMERS.COM mark. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 7:12 pm
As the article notes: Thus far, the E.U. has never taken a strong stand on Georgia vis-a-vis Moscow or, for example, provided practical assistance in terms of meaningful observers or peacekeepers. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:47 pm
If one should honor grievances that go back 205 years, in the case of the 1803 invasion, then what about American Indian tribes who certainly have grievances equal to those of the Georgians vis-a-vis the United States? [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:42 pm
Moreover, Section 41.2 (2) states that the Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing additional circumstances in which paragraph 41.1(1)(a) does not apply, after taking into consideration the following factors: (i) whether not being permitted to circumvent a technological measure that is subject to that paragraph could adversely affect the use a person may make of a work, a performer’s performance fixed in a sound recording or a sound recording when that use is… [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:01 pm
Absent exigent circumstances, the court shall order the parties to maintain the status quo vis-Ã -vis the child's custody and parenting time under the trial court's September 12, 2007, Order pending the outcome of the new hearing, which shall be conducted within thirty days from the date of this opinion. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:13 pm
Even though the Supreme Court had slammed the J&K Bar Association for violating the Code of Conduct for lawyers, it does not seem to have had a demonstrative impact.Custodial violence, randomness and procedural breaches in arrests, corruption in judiciary and utter disregard for ethics by lawyers raises some serious questions about respect for rule of law and justness in our criminal justice system. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
VI. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 11:30 am
Whether he does or not, and though I'm attracted to the logic of the dissent, it's not clear to me that Ross v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 12:23 pm
"Why does our work make us happy? [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:50 am
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has posted some interesting analysis on its site regarding how the very well to do have faired vis-a-vis the rest of the crowd over time. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:24 pm
Finally, a short conclusion will be provided (Part VI). [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:11 am
Mere unanimous election by all parties does not make any difference to the situation. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 8:40 am
The person standing in line has no rights to sell vis-Ã -vis the concert promoter, because there is nothing guaranteed when that "spot" in the line reaches the ticket office. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:07 pm
The Court added that only “extraordinary circumstances can justify a finding of waste and the Complaint here does not present those circumstances. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
Ten years ago or so Lynn Lopucki helped to focus our attention on the unfairness of the treatment of unsecured creditors vis a vis secured creditors. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:25 am
Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that since Congress failed to provide a method to implement the treaty, Texas does not have to abide by the treaty. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:37 pm
To suggest that it does have a duty to manage the business and affairs of CA, Inc. - or even might - is mischievous! [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
The Medellin case constitutes a serious setback to those who would argue that the Supremacy Clause, Article VI, cl.2 of the US Constitution, means what it says: "Treaties . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 8:41 pm
See MPEP 706.07(h)(VI). 4. [read post]
