Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 5301 - 5320 of 11,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2018, 5:33 pm by Jen Yackley
A copy of the draft of the rules as of September 27, 2018 can be found here. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 6:54 pm by Bill Marler
Exposures to the Famous Anthony’s food establishments occurred between August 10 and 27, 2021. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:09 pm by Arnold & Wadsworth
Allen, 2014 Utah App 27 The main issue in Allen was the District Court making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:03 am
As before, this reason does not warrant an exception to the extremely tight calendar dictated by the July 27 trial date, agreed to by both sides. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:15 pm
Compare Concurring Op. at 43 & 34 n.3 (Clay); Concurring Op. at 27 (Moore). [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:48 pm by David Jensen
., made 27 recommendations for improvements, including more effort to ease strain connected to the agency's controversial dual executive arrangement. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Allen, 2014 Utah App 27 The main issue in Allen was the District Court making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Jeffrey White dismissed the case, finding the ordinance does not directly regulate who can speak or what they can say. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
  Id. at *23 ("Without more, parallel conduct does not suggest conspiracy, and a conclusory allegation of agreement at some unidentified point does not supply facts adequate to show illegality. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
” At [27], he also made the point, back on the correct path, that [T]he concept of homelessness does not involve any consideration of whether the individual is intentionally homeless (which the Claimant was not) or in priority need (which the Claimant was not), nor of whether a local housing authority owes him any particular duty to house him consequent on him being homeless (which, as a result of the Claimant not being in priority need, it did not). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 6:35 am by Samuel Cohen
Any data controller/ processor subject to the GDPR by virtue of Article 3(2) must designate a representative established in a Member State (which could be a natural or legal person) within the Union, unless the Article 27 exemption applies (i.e. it is a public body or the processing carried out by it is occasional, does not include large scale processing of special categories of data or data relating to criminal offences and is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and… [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:34 am by David Pocklington
My motion does not give details of how the canonical provisions are to be replaced. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am by Andrew Frisch
Feb.27, 2008) (holding a 15% increase in liability, 23 plaintiffs added to a class of 155, was not prejudicial). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
” At [27], he also made the point, back on the correct path, that [T]he concept of homelessness does not involve any consideration of whether the individual is intentionally homeless (which the Claimant was not) or in priority need (which the Claimant was not), nor of whether a local housing authority owes him any particular duty to house him consequent on him being homeless (which, as a result of the Claimant not being in priority need, it did not). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
  The decision presumably invalidated hundreds of decisions reached since January 1, 2008. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 2:16 pm by Stuart Kaplow
And beginning November 1, 2016, new LEED projects had to register under v4. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:11 pm by MSP Education Blog
  The medication in the example above is also unlikely to be utilized for a period of 27+ years. [read post]