Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 5301 - 5320 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 9:05 am by Kent Scheidegger
From north of the border comes a reminder that freedom of speech is broader in the United States than nearly anywhere else, even our English common-law brethren. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by David Hart QC
Instead of deciding that there should be a statutory compensation scheme backed by the state (as per a very limited English version) , the law decided that pleural plaques amounted to bodily injury. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm by Alex Duperouzel
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009) published on the SFAT’s website at http://www.sfat.gov.hk/english/determination/AN-8_9-2009-Determination.pdf, para 163, para 172-182, para 192-193, para 194 -204 respectively.5. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am by Isabel McArdle
As we have reported, in May 2011 the Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellants) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 am by Jon
Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001), citing Anastasoff v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:44 am by Jon
United States, 223 F.3d 898, vacated as moot on reh'g en banc, 235F.3d 1054 (8th Cir. 2000). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor)   Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of Patents… [read post]