Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 76,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm
In its recent decision in Holman v Brooke, 2022 BCSC 526, the Supreme Court found good reasons to decline ordering a sale of a non stratified duplex home that served as the collective residence of two couples for over 20 years. [read post]
Registration “Before Notice” and Offering Bona Fide Goods or Services Good Defense to UDRP Complaint
18 Oct 2012, 12:01 pm
In Cerruti 1881 s.a.s. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
"FunnyJunk v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
In Pequignot v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
In Staffenberg v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:04 pm
Within minutes, the crew of Good Samaritan GLACIER responded was able to rescue all three CYCLONE crewmembers from the water in good condition. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:54 am
Robert Ambrogi's recent article Casemaker v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
In this latter regard, it is worth emphasising that in the contested decisions the Board of Appeal cited Develey ('Plastikflaschenform') T-129/04, paragraph 19, which stated that… where the Board of Appeal finds that the trade mark sought is devoid of intrinsic distinctive character, it may base its analysis on facts arising from practical experience generally acquired from the marketing of general consumer goods which are likely to be known by anyone and are in… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The EUIPO was able to extend its finding concerning the recognition for goods in Class 16 to goods under Class 28. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:46 am
Other factors may also be considered, such as the distribution channels of the goods concerned (Caventa v OHIM, T‑224/11).In the present case, the goods were neither of the same nature nor the same purpose, nor were they of the same type nor intended for the same purpose or for the same use. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
So let's take a look at Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:16 am
The CJEU took on this question very recently in a very interesting decision.The case of Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:03 am
Orange Bang, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:44 am
But that can't be a good enough reason on its own to refuse to defend it. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 pm
RSVL Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
If lawyers are really eager to have the facts of the Liebeck v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
Fund v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:20 pm
Professor Larry Ribstein, a leading scholar on the "law and economics of law firms", discusses here the front page article in today's Wall Street Journal that predicts a decline in the prevailing practice of lawyers billing by the hour, and the good professor also provides his own analysis of the issues involved in this challenge (spearheaded by larger public companies) to the economic model of most large law firms. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:27 am
The judgments in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (McGeogh) v The Lord President of the Council and Another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63 were handed down in October 2013. [read post]
