Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 5301 - 5320 of 6,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
As a result, the ex-husband was limited to trial cross-examination of the ex-wife as to equitable distribution. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:09 am by Pam Walker Makowski
However, there is a fact issue concerning number of shares son owned where husband filed gift tax returns as to the shares but some returns were unsigned, there was a stock sale restriction document stating that son and husband were sole shareholders that was witnessed by wife, corporate income tax returns indicated husband's transfer to son and there were share certificates in son's name. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:09 am
Rolseth,907 N.E.2d 897 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. 2009), which originated out of Kane County.In that case, the former husband petitioned to declare the nonexistence of a parent-child relationship between him and two of his former wife's children for whom he had been paying child support. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
  If the wife becomes pregnant through donor insemination from a third party's sperm, then there is no possibility or pretense that her husband was physically involved in impregnating her, and the statutory goal is to recognize the intended family grouping and ensure that the resulting child has two legal parents from the moment of its birth. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 3:16 am
Supreme Court's complete decision here: Lane v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:40 am by Caleb Ballew
Michigan, 516 US 442 (1996) (holding that car jointly owned by husband and wife was forfeitable despite wifes innocence in crime of which husband was found guilty). [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:10 am by Peter Klose
Shortly after the Husband's death, his son from a prior marriage made a claim under an old separation agreement with the first wife, wherein the Husband agreed to give "no less than one-half of his probate estate" to the son. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
The ex-husband moved for the termination of alimony based on the ex-wife's cohabitation with an unrelated male. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:27 pm
  Even though the wife was still dependent on the former husband's alimony payments, the Appellate Division concluded that the wife's dependency may have been self-created since it was clear that, to a degree, she supported the person with whom she cohabited without seeking contribution from him for household expenses. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Plaintiff, the deceased’s wife, argued that the exclusion should not apply, since it was unknown whether her husband was actually controlling the aircraft at the time that it crashed. [read post]